A 50-Year Mortgage Is A Crisis, Not A Solution
READ AISHA’S LATEST CONTRIBUTION TO FORBES HERE
“After a decade working side by side with families living in subsidized housing, if there’s one refrain that echoes through every conversation, it’s the hope of homeownership — the practical hope of leaving a valuable asset for future generations, as well as a deep yearning for the autonomy and privacy afforded by having a home of one’s own. Again and again, mothers tell me what they really want isn’t just a yard or extra bedroom, but dignity — the right to claim a home that’s theirs, that their children can remember as an anchor, not a rest stop. Nothing makes this more real than hearing about birthdays held in tight kitchens or kids doing homework on borrowed Wi-Fi, all for the possibility that one day, the sacrifices will pay off. Yet in this context, the recent proposal for 50-year mortgages made by the Trump administration lands not as a lifeline, but as a trap — a heavy shackle disguised as a helping hand, and the latest example of policies that promise much while leaving our most marginalized families burdened with more debt and fewer options.”
What would truly help? ⬇️
1. Short-term fixes like stretching out a bad loan simply don’t cut it. Instead, we need to focus on proven, equity-centered solutions: expanding affordable housing supply, investing in targeted down payment assistance and actively combating predatory lending that preys on desperation with false promises of accessibility.
2. Real change demands policy that is not only attentive to what seems possible in the short term, but also to the history and reality of exclusion and financial harm borne by Black families and other marginalized groups.
3. Wealth-building requires predictability, fair access to credit, support for first-time buyers — and, importantly, options for building equity, not just meeting a lender’s bottom line.


